The Person Alone | Alone in The Presence of Others: Measuring Loneliness (2nd Article)
Are you interested in
finding out how lonely you are? If so, try your hand at the following
questionnaire.
For each statement, indicate how often you feel the way
described. Circle one number for each statement.
Never
|
Rarely
|
Sometimes
|
Often
|
||
1.
|
I am unhappy doing so many things alone.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
2.
|
I have nobody to talk to.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
3.
|
I cannot tolerate being so alone.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
4.
|
I feel as if nobody really understand me.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5.
|
I find myself waiting for people to call or write.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
6.
|
I feel completely alone.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
7.
|
I am unable to reach out and communicate with those around me.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
8.
|
I feel starved for company.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
9.
|
It is difficult for me to make friends.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
10.
|
I feel shut out and excluded by others.
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
Reproduced with the
permission of the authors.
Now, to
determine how lonely you are, simply add up your total score. If your score is
30 or greater, you have unfortunately known the pangs of loneliness, since that
would mean that you have tended to mark the items which indicate loneliness
“sometimes” or “often.” Indeed, if your score is 25 or more you would appear to
be more lonely than the average student at UCLA or the University of Tulsa,
where some of the original data were gathered for development of loneliness
scales. (Russell, Peplau, & Ferguson, 1978; Russell, Peplau, & Cutrona,
1980).
The
items included above were part of the first form of the UCLA Loneliness Scale,
but were excluded from the final version, though they appear to have some
validity and reliability. They are included above were part of the first form
of the UCLA Loneliness Scale, but were excluded from the final version, though
they appear to have some validity and reliability. They are included here in
order to give you some feeling for how such scales are utilized. Investigators
are understandably reluctant to include their scales in widely used
publications, since that might damage their usefulness as instruments for
research and diagnosis. The Loneliness Scale was developed and improved through
administration to a larger number of respondents both in university and
non-university populations. Items which did not hang together, which were not
reliable, were gradually weeded out and the scale ultimately reduced to twenty
items. In addition, there were tests of validity of the scales through such
means as administering them to students who signed up for assistance in a
“Loneliness Clinic” and by comparing people who were depressed, or undergoing
psychotherapy for problems which included loneliness. Some of the correlates of
loneliness, as measured by these scales are described in the text. Using these
measures, the investigators determined that loneliness seems particularly high
for people in their late teens, UCLA Freshmen are particularly lonely, 20% are
as lonely as more advanced students whose loneliness is so severe that they
choose to come to special loneliness clinics. Loneliness appears to decline
over the years, so that older people tend to be less lonely than middle-aged
and younger people—until they reach a very old age (in their eighties) at which
point loneliness appears to increase again.
(Source: Raven, Bertram H., Rubin, Jeffrey Z. (1983). SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc: United States of America.)
× 『rui@96yR』【butterflyuu】 ×
Komentar
Posting Komentar